Questions, answered plainly
Including the ones with answers you might not want to hear.
Product
DFSGPT is the product; JARVIS is the analysis engine inside it — the thing that reads each slate, grades every player and writes the reasoning you read.
It starts with the slate itself — salaries, the player pool, the games, the contest format, available projections and ownership, injuries and context.
Then it processes relevant research and analysis and synthesises what matters, rather than handing you more content to read.
Lock the players you want, fade the ones you don’t, adjust your pool — or let JARVIS handle more of it. The analysis exists so you can disagree with it for a reason.
Yes, for DraftKings and FanDuel, built around the grades and the strategy for the contest you selected. You can generate a single lineup or a portfolio of tournament builds.
Plenty of people do. Read the slate breakdown and the grades, then build wherever you like.
Ask questions about the slate in plain English — why a player is a fade, the best pivot off a piece of chalk, or to build around a particular stack.
Strategy
Because the contests are asking different questions. Cash is won by collecting a reliable median; a large-field tournament is won by finding a first-place path, which usually means accepting variance cash would punish you for.
So a player carries a grade per contest type, and they routinely disagree. A player whose availability is unresolved, for instance, stops being a cash priority immediately — a zero destroys a median even when it barely dents a tournament.
Cash weighting leans on floor and role certainty. GPP weighting leans on ceiling, correlation and ownership leverage. Same slate, different objective.
Yes. Correlated combinations are identified as part of the analysis and carried into tournament lineup construction, with the game script behind each one.
From the same evidence as everything else — salary, ownership, matchup, role and contest dynamics. A fade is a conclusion, and the reasoning is shown alongside it.
Sports & platforms
NFL, NBA, MLB and PGA. Availability and slate coverage vary by sport and time of year.
Both. Slates are analysed per site, because salaries, scoring and roster construction differ enough that one answer would not serve both.
Yes, with strategy specific to single-game formats — including which players belong in the captain or MVP slot, which is a different question from who belongs in the lineup.
On main slates: cash, double-up, head-to-head, single entry, 3-max, 20-max, small-field GPP, large-field GPP and Milly Maker. On Showdown: single-game cash, small field and large field.
Billing
A one-time purchase covering one sport for as long as that season’s slates run. It does not auto-renew.
A subscription covering all four sports, billed monthly or yearly.
All Access Monthly includes a seven-day free trial. Cancel inside it and you are not charged. Season Passes have no trial.
From your profile, in one click. Access continues to the end of the period you have paid for.
Nothing changes. Founding members keep the rate they signed up at and keep access to every sport.
Stripe. Card details are entered on Stripe’s own checkout and never touch our servers.
Email support@dfsgpt.com from the address you paid with. Access is recorded per purchase, so it can be checked and repaired directly.
Expectations
No, and nobody honestly can. DFS has real variance and a good lineup loses regularly.
What this gives you is a consistent process and the reasoning behind every call, so you can tell a bad decision from a bad result.
No. DFSGPT provides research and analysis. It does not operate contests, accept wagers, or guarantee outcomes.
Treat DFS as entertainment with real financial risk, decide a bankroll before you play, and never play with money you cannot afford to lose.
Ready to let JARVIS do the research?
Open the most recent slate and see what it made of it.
All Access · $29/month after trial · Cancel anytime